Thursday, July 4, 2013

ADSS Volume 6 Hungary

ADSS Volume 6 is the first volume in the series that deals exclusively with the victims of the war.  Of the 419 documents 154 (36%) deal directly with Jews and anti-Jewish persecution.  Previously I had traced the development of the Vatican's understanding of the "Jewish Question" in Slovakia under Priest-President Josef Tiso.  What I intend to do now is look at the same development in Vatican understanding with Hungary.

Traditional Catholic Judeophobia marked church life in Hungary, just as it did across most of Europe.  And while there was a substantial number of Catholics with Jewish ancestry as well as some converts, this was not sufficient to mark any change on either official positions of popular myths and phobias regarding Jews.  As Hungary moved more and more to the political right through the 1930s the situation for Hungarian Jewry began to worsen.

Angelo Rotta (1872-1965) was nuncio to Hungary from 1930 to 1945.  Originally from Milano and ordained in 1895, Rotta entered the diplomatic service of the Holy See and served as Internuncio to Central America from 1922-1925, Apostolic Delegate to Turkey 1925-1930 before his appointment to Hungary on 20 March 1930.  Rotta witnessed the increasing resentment towards Hungarian Jewry by the parties of the far-right and provided a steady and detailed set of reports to Rome.  

ADSS 6 begins with in March 1939 at the beginning of the papacy of Pius XII.

Contained in the collection are 15 reports from the nuncio to Rome and 6 instructions from Rome.  This number will jump substantially in 1944.  Among the 15 reports Rotta sent to Rome six deal directly with the second set of anti-Jewish laws passed by the Hungarian parliament in May 1939.

On 8 April 1938 Hungary promulgated a law limiting to 20% the number of Jews in commercial, financial and academic professions as well as the number of Jewish employees in similar organisations.  Jews were defined as people who had converted to Judaism after 1919 or who were born of Jewish parents after that date.  The church made no major objection to this law; in fact there was no protest of any kind until 1944 and then only for converted Jews.  In late May 1938 Cardinal Eugenio Pacelli went to Budapest as the personal representative of Pope Pius XI for the Eucharistic Congress.  He made no reference to the law just passed in Hungary.

The second anti-Jewish laws were passed on 5 May 1939.  The definition of "Jew" was revised to a racial formula identical to the definition found in the 1935 Nuremberg Laws.  The 20% limit on Jewish membership in the professions was reduced to 6%.  The law was passed, with some modifications and reservations, with the support of Cardinal Seredi, and Bishop Glattfelder who sat in the Upper House of the Hungarian parliament.  Overnight about 250,000 Jews lost their livelihoods. 

The Jewish population of Hungary in 1930 was counted as 447,567.  According to the 31 January 1941 census the Jewish population had risen because of legal redefinitions and territorial expansion to 725,007 along with Christians who were now classified as Jews.  It was estimated that between 85,000 to 100,000 people fell into this category.

By the time the third set of anti-Jewish laws were passed on 8 August 1941 the Hungarian definition of "Jew" exceeded German legal terms.  A "Jew" was anyone who had two Jewish grandparents, had been raised a Jew, married to a Jew or to a person with at least one Jewish grandparent, a child born of a Jewish mother and unknown father, a child born of a half-Jewish mother and unknown father and who had not been baptised as a child.  Under the last set of laws approximately 58,300 more people were added as "Jews". 

Nuncio Rotta's reports are valuable for the insight the thinking and course of action of Cardinal Justinian Seredi (1884-1945), bishop of Ezstergom and Primate of Hungary.  Seredi was not known for his sympathy for the Jews unless they were converts.  The substance of his argument  was in part a defence of traditional Catholic teaching and the hope that by supporting the "moderate" position a greater evil would be avoided.

After the passage of the May 1939 laws, documents to and from Rotta are rare and mostly involve providing help for Polish and Czech refugees in Hungary.  This was to remain the pattern until 1944. 



Angelo Rotta (1872-1965)
Nuncio to Hungary 1930-1945



Tuesday, July 2, 2013

ADSS 4.393 Peter II to Pius XII - plight of the Serbs

From his exile in Jerusalem, King Peter II of Yugoslavia (1923-1970) (reigned 1934-1945) wrote to the pope appealing for his help for the Serbs now under German and Croatian control.  According to the king his countrymen were facing a terrible future.  Anti-Serb laws had been passed in much the same way that anti-Jewish laws had been.  The comparison was telling for its bluntness.  The Croatians and Germans were intent on wiping out Serbs in much the same way they appeared to be eliminating Jews.  Indeed the king used the phrase "systematic extermination" to describe what was happening.

This is yet another indicator of how much news was reaching beyond Europe with details that were more or less accurate.

ADSS 4.393 King Peter II, in exile in Jerusalem to Pope Pius XII.

Reference: AES 4931/41

Location and date: 08.06.1941, Jerusalem

Summary statement:  The King describes the Nazi terror in Yugoslavia; atrocities against the Serbs; Croats ‘systematically exterminating’ Serbs and Jews.  Appeals to Pope

Language: French

Text:

Barely have two months passed since the German armed aggression against Yugoslavia and we have already reached new dimensions inflicted on the Serbian people in the occupied provinces of Yugoslavia that have revolted the civilised world.

In Banat, in the north (1), occupying German troops have hanged and engaged in mass shootings of the Serbian population.

The most atrocious terror has been the forced abandonment of homes and country by tens of thousands of Serbs in the shortest time and in the most complete destitution.

In southern Serbia the Bulgarian occupation forces have massacred many Serbs among them, and without any mercy, are priests and teachers.  Those who escaped the massacres had to leave their homes.

The so-called independent kingdom of Croatia (2) Serbs are doomed to systematic extermination. To make this most brutal act, so odious to the civilised world, more effective and the extermination quicker, the law against the Jews is also applied to the Serbs.  Reduced to the level of a lower race, Serbs are deprived by law of the means for human existence.  The lives of over two million Serbs who have lived in these countries for centuries are imperilled in the most barbarous way.  Never before has a Christian people been reduced and persecuted to this point by an authority that also prides itself in being Christian. (3)

I appeal to Your Holiness that you take my people who suffer such unjust violence, under the goodness of your protection and authority.

Peter II, King of Yugoslavia.


Notes:
(1) The territory of Banat, bordering Romania, was ceded to Serbia but was under German military governorship for the duration of the war.

(2) The proclamation of an independent Croatia took place on 10.04.1941; the proclamation of the Kingdom of Croatia took place on 16-18.05.1941.

(3) Yad Vashem estimates the total number of Serbian dead during the war reached upwards of 500,000.  In addition another 250,000 were expelled from their homes and about 200,000 forcibly converted to Catholicism.
Of 82,500 Jews in Yugoslavia in 1941 only 14,000 (17%) survived the war.




 Peter II of Yugoslavia

ADSS 4.291 Orsenigo to Maglione - German actions against Jews and Catholics

While the bulk of ADSS 4 is not directly related to Jewish issues, there are a number of documents where mention is made of a significant event relevant to understanding the development of the Holocaust.  One of these events was the "February Strike" in Amsterdam in 1941.  Orsenigo had received reports from Amsterdam from a number of sources but the focus was, not surprisingly, on a series of anti-Catholic actions undertaken by the occupying German forces in Holland.  There is overlap between the anti-Jewish pogroms and the attacks on several Catholic institutions but the events are not connected directly.

The document needs to be seen within several contexts.

After the Dutch surrender to Germany in May 1940 anti-Jewish measures began.  Jews were systematically expelled from the social and economic life of Holland.  At the same time Germany began demanding Dutch men "volunteer" for work in the Reich.

The National Socialist Movement in the Netherlands (Nationaal-Socialistische Beweging in Nederland) was the only political movement permitted to exist under the Occupation.  NSB members took it upon themselves to enter Jewish neighbourhoods in Amsterdam and incite fights.  Local Jewish self-defence groups fought back, often with local non-Jewish supporters.  On 11.02.1941 during a street fight instigated by the NSB a Dutch Nazi was mortally injured.  On the following day German troops assisted by Dutch police cordoned off the Jewish district in Amsterdam  and forbade entry to non-Jews.

A week later on 19.02.1941 a botched raid by German police on an ice cream parlour owned by German Jews resulted in a riot and several Germans were injured.  

In retaliation the Germans sent in the SS on 22-23.02.1941 who conducted a full-scale pogrom in the Jewish district.  Over 400 men and boys were seized and transported to KL Buchenwald or KL Mauthausen.  Only two are known to have survived the war.

Outrage at the pogrom and fearing that actions against and deportation of Dutch Jews would also lead to action against and deportation of non-Jewish Dutch men galvanised various Catholic, Protestant, Social Democratic groups and the underground Dutch Communist Party into agitating for a General Strike on 25.02.1941.  

Although the strike was unsuccessful and the Germans quickly suppressed it, it was the biggest act of civil resistance to German forced labour and deportation policies.  More significantly, it was the biggest demonstration of public anger at German anti-Jewish policies and actions.  German occupation authorities adopted less confrontational strategies thereafter.  Deportation of Dutch Jews did not begin in earnest until January 1942.

From Orsenigo's letter to Cardinal Maglione it seems that the pogrom against Amsterdam's Jews was an unplanned event in contrast to the actions taken against several Catholic institutions.  Archbishop De Jong had condemned the BSB in 1936 and went even further with excommunication of all members of the organisation after the German invasion in May 1940.  The Catholic Church had placed itself publicly and unambiguously against the occupation and made several public protests, such as the one mentioned here, always with dire outcomes.  The occupiers were not slow in moving against it.  Catholic media was shut down, institutes of higher learning were watched carefully and dozens of outspoken priests and theologians were arrested.  Many of them were sent to KL Dachau where they died.

The story of Henricus Hoeben, a Catholic journalist and man of integrity, stands out.  His story should be more widely known.  There is a link in the notes for more information.

It could well be that the two events were in an unintended parallel chain of events.



ADSS 4.291 Cesare Orsenigo, Germany to Cardinal Maglione

Reference:  Report number 1142.  AES 2543/41

Location and date: Berlin, 19.03.1941

Summary statement:  Nuncio still questioning the reasons for the brutality of the Gestapo against the Dutch clergy and repression of Jews in Amsterdam.

Language: Italian

Text:
 I have the honour to communicate to your Eminence, that despite an express intervention by Reverend Father Drehmanns (1) for precise information about the tragic events in Holland, as yet I have little knowledge.  The informants are limited to expressing their disapproval for the brutality of the events, but no one says exactly what led to this wave of reprisals against the Jews in Amsterdam and against several religious houses in Limberg, including the major missionary institute of the Steyl Fathers (2).

It was originally believed that the public condemnation of the policies of the National Socialist League (3) by the Bishops was the cause of everything (4) but in reality the condemnation does not appear to have been the real cause; the bishops are all at liberty in their dioceses.  Only his Excellency, William Lemmens, bishop of Roermond (5), had the sorrow of seeing his seminary cleared out in two hours and then occupied by thirty members of the Secret State Police.

Not only are they punishing the priests, who published the condemnation of the National Socialist League, but it would appear however, from the searches and interrogations conducted by the secret police (Gestapo), that they are looking for accomplices of those involved with the newspaper “Der Deutsche Weg”. (6) This could explain the arrest of Monsignor Neuhäusler, canon of the cathedral chapter of Munich along with the closure of some religious houses (7).   Some people suspect that incriminating documents were found at the headquarters of The International Catholic Press Office (8), which I think operated in Breda.

His Excellency Monsignor Johannes De Jong, archbishop of Utrecht, who had been unhappy with some of the criticisms moved by the clergy for the condemnation of the National Socialist League, was very glad to receive the august letter sent to him by the Holy Father. (9)

His Excellency Monsignor William Lemmens, bishop of Roermond, who has not uttered a word after witnessing the forced eviction of his seminary and who has kept a sustained silent demeanour, which has made a great impression, noted that his Excellency the Archbishop of Utrecht has not made a formal protest.

At present, the Dutch fear new measures beyond those already imposed on Catholic schools and institutions may extend to associations, which will destroy much of Catholic activity in Holland.

Notes:
(1) Joseph Drehmanns (1882-1959), a Redemptorist priest, had been in contact with Orsenigo in Berlin and the Internuncio to The Hague, Paolo Giobbe (1880-1972), now resident in Rome.  The incident referred to in this document was most likely the “February Strike” of 25.02.1941 organised by underground banned trade union groups in protest at Dutch Nazi attacks on Amsterdam Jews.  The German occupation forces suppressed the strike the following day. 

(2) Steyl fathers – refers to the mother house of the Divine Word Missionaries founded by Arnold Janssen in Steyl in 1875.

(3) The National Socialist League in Holland (NSB – Nationaal-Socialistische Beweging in Nederland) was founded by Anton Mussert (1894-1946) in 1931.  It remained the only non-German political party in the Netherlands throughout the war. It was banned after the war and the leaders arrested.  Mussert was executed by firing squad near The Hague on 07.05.1946.

(4) The Dutch bishops had condemned Nazism in a joint pastoral letter of 13.01.1941 that was read out in churches on 26.01.1941.  The Amsterdam newspaper De Tijd published the text the following day.  The text was sent to Rome soon after.  A note made by Montini on 27.02.1945 (AES 1707-1741) said: “After audience with His Holiness. It would be good to send the Dutch bishops text to Monsignor Cicognani, and see that it is published”.  The National Catholic Welfare Committee published the Dutch pastoral in its February newsletter.  The Catholic Herald (UK) published a report on the protest on 15.08.1941:
The Nazi authorities in Holland are extremely angry with the Dutch Catholic bishops who have just issued and read a pastoral letter in all their churches protesting against the Nazis interfering with Catholic Workers' organisations. A Dutch Nazi, Woudenberg, who has recently been appointed Commissar for the Catholic Workers' Union, replying to the Bishops' protests in a broadcast, said the Catholic Church by its action, is trying to appear a martyr, Catholics, he added, are not the only body who has had these rights over clubs and associations taken away.
Goring's paper Essener Nationale Zeitung reports that the Archbishop of Utrecht, Mgr. de Jong, has been fined 400 guilders for refusing to participate in what they describe as "propaganda against pagan Bolshevism" " While it is not understandable, it is unfortunately true." the article added, "that all Catholic organisations in Holland refuse to acknowledge that the German fight against pagan Bolshevism is a battle for Christianity."

So far the text of the pastoral letter has not been received in this country”.


(5) Jozef Hulbert Willem Lemmens (1884-1960) bishop of Roermond 1932-1957. Lemmens had been rector of the seminary before his episcopal ordination.

(6) Der Deutsche Weg was a weekly anti-Nazi paper begun in Oldenzaal, Holland, in August 1934 by the Jesuit Friedrich Muckermann (1883-1946) and editor Joseph Steinhage.  It was sent clandestinely into Germany. The Gestapo raided the headquarters on the morning of 10.05.1940.  During the war, Steinhage remained in hiding though various members of his family were deported to Germany. The director, Dutchman Dr Franz Stokmann died in a concentration camp.  In 1943 Riechskomissar, Arthur Seyss-Inquart (1892-1946) announced (wrongly) that Muckermann had remained in Holland. The German consul in Rome, Fritz Menshausen (1885-1958) wrote a report on 19.06.1937 about Muckermann who was then living in the city.  He described him as “one of the most dangerous and active opponents of National Socialism“. (National Archives T-120. Roll 71.56546).  The Gestapo searched across Europe in vain for Muckermann.  He died in Switzerland in 1946.

(7) See ADSS 2.209 n3. Johannes Neuhäusler (1888-1973) was a known anti-Nazi. He was sent to KL Sachsenhausen in February 1941 before being sent to KL Dachau in May 1941.  He was appointed as auxiliary bishop of Munich in 1947.

(8) Henricus Johannes Hoeben (1899-1942) established the Bureau International de la Presse Catholique (The International Bureau of the Catholic Press) in Breda in 1927.  It was designed to be a “clearing house” for media relevant to Catholic interests. Hoeben and his family fled the Netherlands in May 1940 but for family reasons returned from France at the end of July.  He was arrested on 01.08.1940 and sent to Berlin where he died in late February 1942.


(9) Jan de Jong (1885-1955), archbishop of Utrecht (1936-1955). The letter of the pope sent on 18.01.1941, arrived on 04.02.1941.

Monday, July 1, 2013

Alessandra Farkas "The Alleged Hero" the original article on Giovanni Palatucci

This is the English translation of the original article published in Corriere della Sera on 23 May 2013.  Farkas' article has gone through dozens of news services over the last month.  I have taken this version from the 14 June 2013 edition of The Times of Israel.


THE ALLEGED HERO

Palatucci, shadows cast on the life of the “Italian Schindler”

Said to have saved over 5,000 Jews in a region where there were not even half that
number. Myth or sensational hoax?
_______________________________________________________________
From our correspondent ALESSANDRA FARKAS

NEW YORK – His Wikipedia page remembers him, in at least ten different languages, as “the Italian police commissioner who saved thousands of Jews from being deported to Nazi extermination camps during the Second World War and for this was deported to the Dachau Concentration Camp, where he died.” “For his actions, Giovanni Palatucci was decorated with the ‘Medaglia d’oro’ award for civil merit, and honored as one of the ‘Righteous Among the Nations’ by Yad Vashem (September 12, 1990) and ‘Servant of God’ by the Catholic Church,” according to the free encyclopedia.


2009 stamp issued in Palatucci's honour.

ITALIAN SCHINDLER OR FRAUD? – But if we heed the growing chorus of historians and scholars who for years have been studying the most celebrated of “righteous” Italians, the myth of Palatucci is nothing more than a sensational fraud orchestrated by the alleged hero’s friends and relatives who claimed he had saved over 5,000 Jews in a region where there
lived less than half that number of Jews. The hypothesis of a massive rescue mission by Palatucci had already been categorically denied by the Italian Ministry of Internal Affairs in a memorandum dated July 1952 and later by Yad Vashem’s Institute of the Righteous commission in 1990. At a round table discussion organized by the Centro Primo Levi at the Casa Italiana Zerilli-Marimò in New York, the ex-director of Yad Vashem, Mordecai Paldiel explained that under his supervision, in 1990, Palatucci was recognized “Righteous Among the Nations” for having helped “just one woman,” Elena Aschkenasy, in 1940, and that the commission “did not find any evidence or testimony that he might have assisted anyone outside of this case.”

PRIZES, RECOGNITIONS AND BIOGRAPHIES – And yet in 1955 the Union of the Italian Jewish Communities recognized him and in 1995 the Italian government decorated him with the “Medaglia d’oro” award for civil merit. During the ecumenical ceremony for the Jubilee on May 7, 2000, Pope John Paul II included him among the martyrs of the 20th century. 

The diocesan phase of the canonization process concluded officially naming the hero who died in Dachau in 1945, at the age of 36, a “Servant of God.” But who conducted the historical research on which these recognitions were based? What spawned the myth of the “Italian Schindler”? The official biographies – the latest of which, Giovanni Palatucci: un giusto e martire cristiano by Antonio De Simone and Michele Bianco with a preface by Cardinal Camillo Ruini – speak of thousands of Jews being sent to the internment camp in the town of Campagna where they would have been protected by Bishop Giuseppe Maria Palatucci, Giovanni’s uncle. The notorious internment camp that the Bishop himself, in 1953, called a “vacation spot.” “Impossible,” replies Anna Pizzuti, editor of the database of foreign Jewish internees in Italy (www.annapizzuti.it), “no more than forty Fiume residents were interned in Campagna. A third of the group ended up in Auschwitz.”

THE DROWNED AND THE SAVED – The biographies then recall the 800 Jewish refugees who in 1939 secretly boarded a Greek ship, the Agia Zoni, that departed from Fiume on March 17, 1939 headed for Palestine and that is said to have been personally organized by the heroic commissioner. But from the diary of the group’s guide preserved at Yad Vashem and the documents of the port authority collected in the Italian State Archives, it becomes clear that it was actually an operation of the Jewish Agency of Zurich, carried out under the strict watch of Palatucci’s superiors who not only exacted a painful process of extortion but also sent back to the border the neediest refugees, the stateless and those who came from Dachau.

FROM REALITY TO MYTH – From the archives we find that Palatucci was an officer of public security at the police headquarters in Fiume from 1937 to 1944, where he worked in the immigration bureau and was in charge of the census of Jewish citizens on the basis of which the Prefecture applied Mussolini’s Racial Laws. Precisely in Fiume the census was conducted so thoroughly and the laws applied with such zeal that it provoked international protests and a reaction from the Ministry of Internal Affairs itself. According to the monograph by Silva Bon Le Comunità ebraiche della Provincia italiana del Carnaro Fiume e Abbazia (1924-1945) and the data collected in the Libro della Memoria by Liliana Picciotto, during Palatucci’s brief regency the percentage of Jews deported from Fiume was among the highest in Italy. The family portrait recently published by Silvia Cuttin, Ci sarebbe bastato, clearly and accurately depicts the tragic experience of the Jews of Fiume.


Palatucci, seated centre, with colleagues in the Fascist Police HQ Fuime 
(before September 1943 - portrait of the King is still in place)

A ZEALOUS AND WILLING FASCIST – In Giovanni Palatucci, Una Giusta Memoria Marco Coslovich reconstructs the ambiguous professional profile of a vice commissioner of police who at just thirty years of age swears loyalty to the Republic of Salò. “Palatucci never served as chief of police in Fiume,” Coslovich reveals, “but as an adjunct vice commissioner under the control of superiors who were notoriously anti-Semitic.” As opposed to being in conflict with them, documentation shows that he was considered a model public servant. Considered to be “irreplaceable” by the prefect Testa, he fully enjoyed the favor of his superiors. 

Between April and the beginning of September 1944, he was regent and directly dependent to the upper echelon of Salò, Tullio Tamburini and Eugenio Cerruti. Even the historian Michele Sarfatti in the episode of the television program La storia siamo noi dedicated to Palatucci, in 2008, expressed doubts as to the plausibility of the disproportionate numbers attributed to a community that numbered just over a thousand people, furthermore, who between immigration and internment were reduced to little more than 500 by October 1943.

AN AD HOC HERO FOR ITALY IN THE AFTERMATH OF WORLD WAR II – According to the Venetian historian Simon Levis Sullam, the Palatucci affair is tied to the broader problem of how anti-Semitic persecution in Fascist Italy – and the role Italians played in it – has been represented in the 68 years since the end of the war. Co-editor of the most recent important study on the Shoah in Italy published by UTET (2012), Sullam explains: “The myth of the good Italian has constituted a source of collective self-absolution after the Second World War regarding the support offered to anti-Semitic and racist politics in the period 1937-1945, in which thousands of Italians participated directly.” Coslovich emphasizes how more than half of Palatucci’s personal dossier reflects the efforts carried out by his father, Felice, and his uncle, the Bishop, aimed at rehabilitating the commissioner who was enlisted in the Allies’ purge trials, obtaining a war pension to which the government claimed he had no right and involving the Italian government in recognizing their relative as a “savior of Jews.”

HIS UNCLE, THE BISHOP – Between 1952 and 1953, bishop Giuseppe Maria Palatucci availed himself of the collaboration of Rodolfo Grani, a Jew from Fiume of Hungarian origin whom he had met during Grani’s brief internment in Campagna. However, the historian Mauro Canali, expert in the history of the fascist police system at the University of Camerino, maintains that in the copious documentary evidence regarding Grani there is no indication that he ever met Giovanni Palatucci. Someone who did, however, meet Palatucci was the Baron Niel Sachs de Gric, also a Fiume-based Jew of Hungarian descent, a lawyer in the ecclesiastical court and representative of the Holy See for the Concordat with Jugoslavia. In 1952, the bishop sent De Gric an article for publication in the periodical Osservatore Romano with an “invitation” to sign it with his own name. The documents attributed to Grani and Sachs, whose authenticity demands to be verified and neither of which received the commissioner’s assistance, are the origin of the entire Palatucci epic. The last piece of the legend to fall is the one connected to the circumstances of his death. The arrest warrant signed by Herbert Kappler and deposited in the Central Archives of State leaves no doubt: Palatucci was accused of treason by the Germans for having transmitted to the enemy (the British) documents of the Social Republic of Salò requesting negotiations for Fiume’s independence. Not for having protected the Jews of that city.

Translated by STEVE BAKER





ALESSANDRA FARKAS