Showing posts with label Slovakia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Slovakia. Show all posts

Monday, January 25, 2016

ADSS 1.162 Kaldewey to Maglione: news from Romania


ADSS 1.162 Umberto Kaldewey (1), Charge d’affaires, Budapest Nunciature to Luigi Maglione, Sec State

Reference: Report number 2657/1939; AES 6348/39

Location and date: Budapest, 31.08.1939

Summary statement: Romania has proposed a non-aggression pact with Hungary without success; Hungary calls for a pact for the protection of minorities.  Hungarian press is silent on the German occupation of Slovakia.  Friendly demonstrations outside the German and Italian legations.

Language: Italian

Text:

Hungary also, naturally, takes the necessary precautions required by the present difficult situation, but the calm, order and discipline which prevails in Budapest and in the centre of the country is noted even abroad. Parliament is due to open again on 14 September when a Bill on agrarian reform will be introduced.

The Hungarian Government has expressed to the Rumanian Government its anxiety about the vast movement of soldiers taking place in Rumania.  The Bucharest Government replied that no aggressive intention should be seen in these activities: they are only concentrations of army units that are part of the autumn manoeuvres for exercise purposes.  In order to give proof of its peaceful intentions towards it neighbours, the Rumanian government has declared itself ready to sign a non-aggression pact between Rumania and Hungary.  The Hungarian Government replied that it was unable to accept this proposal; it does not object to the mobilisation, but it does not consider that the concentration of Rumanian troops along the Hungarian border is a friendly act.  The Hungarian Government, giving proof of its good will, proposed to the Rumanian Government that, instead, a treaty for the protection of the minorities should be concluded because in such a way the relations between the two nations could be improved; such a treaty, moreover, notwithstanding its political nature, could not be construed as a consequence of the mobilisation and the movements of the Rumanian army.

The news that German troops have entered Slovakia has not created any excitement here.

A small number of people with swastika emblems were able – notwithstanding the prohibition of the authorities – to set up a demonstration of sympathy in front of the Italian and the German Legations – as I informed you in my report Number 27 (1) The Hungarian newspapers have disapproved almost unanimously of this gesture, made more or less for internal political purposes, considering it offensive to Germany and Italy as if sympathy towards the two Axis partners in Hungary could be deduced from the action of a few swastika bearers.

Hopes unfortunately are every moment becoming frighteningly weaker; but the people anxiously follow the efforts which are being made to avoid war and especially, with profound gratitude, the noble efforts of the Holy Father in favour of peace.

Notes:
(1) Umberto Kaldewey, priest of the diocese of Rome, was Charge d’Affaires at the Hungarian Nunciature since at least 1928. 
(2) Not published in ADSS.


ADSS 1.158 Cortesi to Maglione: Poland prepares for war


ADSS 1.158 Filippo Cortesti, Poland, to Luigi Maglione, Sec State

Reference: Report number 271 (AES 5952/39)

Location and date: Warsaw, 30.08.1939

Summary statement: Poland prepares for war; messages from the Pope, FDR and King Leopold III of Belgium, have been well received.  Gov’t denies all accusations of mistreatment of German minority.  Military occupation of Slovakia further diminishes hopes for peace.

Language: Italian

Text:

While statesmen, politicians and diplomats try to reach a peaceful solution or a delay by compromise of the conflict which threatens to transform itself into a terrifying war, living in an alternating state of hope and disillusion, the mobilisation of the army is being speeded up, while shelters and first-aid points are being prepared as protection against air raids and gas attacked.

The capital, however, has not lost its normal appearance; citizens are calm, disciplined and co-operate in these preparations; everything is quiet and the silence is only broken by the cheering at the passing of soldiers.  The sight of the young soldiers marching towards their assigned destinations with determined yet carefree countenance is extremely impressive. Looking at these happy youths marching towards their hazardous trials one feels and acute sense of sadness only slightly alleviated by the thought that all, or almost all, are fortified by the holy sacraments received before departure and that religious assistance is well organised, as I am assured by the Chaplain General. (1)

It is easy to understand that the nation, which until yesterday was only devoted to the peaceful task of the national recovery, is aware that she is going to fight for her independence, which she acquired only twenty years ago by shedding so much blood.  But the common wish and aspiration is for peace, invoked, as desired by the Holy Father, with humility, with constant prayers by all the Christian believers who fill up the churches, gather themselves near the confessionals, and crowd around the altar.  The message of the King of the Belgians, the appear of the President of the United States, the reply of President Moscicki to Mr Roosevelt, and above all, the fatherly and admirable message of His Holiness, have been therefore received with feelings of relief and gratitude.

II

The conflict, at least in its present stage, ins principally about the condition of the German minorities in Poland, who are described by the Press, the official propaganda and the declarations of the German rulers as being subjected to cruel and inhumane treatment.

The Polish Government absolutely denies that such harsh conditions exist as are being so persistently alleged and denounces the plan to “transform the problem of the German minorities in Poland from a simple cultural one into a territorial problem”.  The daily Press has taken up the defence; but lately the Government itself has felt the need to highlight officially this serious question by means of speeches from top officials being broadcast in various languages and in particular by means of the statement of the Foreign Minister and of the information which I attach to the present document. (Appendix I) (2)

The Polish defence does not restrict itself to rejecting the accusations as untrue, but after describing the conditions of the Germans scattered in small colonies in Poland, enjoying all the rights guaranteed by the Constitution and buy the country’s laws, compares it with the condition in which the Poles in Germany live, who form a compact population which is more numerous and with a longer claim to be indigenous.

III

I must add that the diplomatic circles outside the conflict and therefore impartial, are of the opinion that the accusations put forward by the German Government are false, and are probably based on reports and information of ill-intentioned people; nobody believes that this Government, which has done everything to avoid giving pretexts to the adversary, and has suffered many violations of its rights in Danzig and of Polish territory from armed bands, always limiting its actions to repelling aggression without undertaking reprisals, in in fact the instigator of inhuman oppression. (3)

This question, continually aired with incredible passion, has contributed and continues to contribute to the stirring-up of the masses and the creation of an atmosphere of hatred and desire for war.  This is the reason why so many efforts are being made to induce both parties to reach an understanding on this important subject.  Poland, as is well know, declared herself ready to follow up an initiative in this direction put forward to both Governments.  The diplomatic representatives think that it is possible to suggest as practical means: exchange of population and an enquiry on the alleged hardships to be entrusted to a neutral State; I cannot say, however, on what the possibility of using such means is based.

IV

While closing these brief notes, I hear that Slovakia has been occupied militarily, which action has been announced as a “German-Slovak security arrangement against the risk of attack by Poland” and the Slovak people are invited to consider the Germans as friends and to collaborate with them against the common enemy. (4)

This Government has immediately sent a strong protest about the occupation of Slovakia, declaring it “an outrage against Poland’s interests that could have serious consequences”.

Thus, while all anxiously follow the development of the negotiations between London and Berlin and watch the moderating influence which it is reported the Head of the Italian Government is exerting in favour of peace, a new blow is struck at these efforts, and one is induced to place all hopes only in the hands of God and of His Vicar on Earth, who repeats to mankind with superhuman tenacity the eternal words of justice and peace.

Notes: 
(1) Jozef Gawlina (1892-1964), Polish bishop for the Military 1933-47.
(2) Cortesi added an observation by the Polish Telegraphic Agency (PAT) which had put out an official bulletin.  This declaration made an issue of the German Press campaign about alleged brutalities being committed in Poland against the German minority. As long as this campaign had been limited to the Press, said the bulletin, the Polish Government had confined itself to mere denials.  But now senior people in the Reich were repeating accusations.  “In view of this fact the Polish Government has been constrained to make a solemn protest”.  In citing new examples of news reports of German deaths in various Polish villages, the note commented that “the foregoing reports must be branded as pure invention.  None of the facts given is true.”  As well as this note the Nuncio sent the “Polish Press and Diplomatic Bulleting for Information and Press News” for 29-30.08.1939.
(3) Nonetheless, the British Government believed the Polish Government had to do more to be absolutely transparent in order to void the German propaganda. See Lord Halifax’s telegram to Kennard in Warsaw advising the Polish government to issue clear instructions to all military and civil authorities restrain from any actions that could escalate tensions, including “stop inflammatory radio propaganda”. DBFP, Series 3, Volume 7, n532, pp 405-06.  Polish Foreign Minister, Jozef Beck, assured the British that Poland had no intention of provoking Germany. Ibid, n 544, pp414-15.

(4) On 31.08.1939 Slovakia demanded Poland cede Javorina district that had been given to Poland after the 1938 Munich Agreement.  Slovak troops occupied the region on 01.09.1939.  At the same time the British Ambassador to Germany informed Lord Halifax of Germany’s battle plans for the invasion of Poland. DBFP, Series 3, Volume 7, n546, pp 415-17.  The Ambassador would not have known that Hitler had given the final order confirming the invasion of Poland for Friday, 01.09.1939.

Monday, September 22, 2014

Update on Emil Floris and the sermon in Slovakia

There has not been much in the media about the comments made by Fr Emil Floris in Slovakia several weeks ago.  Other than the JTA most media have been very quiet. 

The most comprehensive reports I have read that comes close to giving me a full English summary has been on the US based conservative Truth Revolt and the British atheist journal The Freethinker sites. Journalist Jeff Dunetz reported that Floris claimed the era of Slovakian-German collaboration was a period of freedom. This does not auger well and is at odds with both Pope Francis, the Catholic bishops of Slovakia and the Prime Minister, Robert Fico, who issued a formal apology for Slovakia's persecution of the Jews.

If any reader has an English translation of the sermon, I am prepared to post it.


Monday, September 8, 2014

This is 2014 not 1944 - appalling sermon from Slovakia

I read this this morning.  It is disturbing to say the least.  If it had been written in 1944 I might be able to put an historical context about it, but it was written in the last two days.

Emil Floris (born 1955) is a priest of the diocese of Zilina in Slovakia.  Ordained in 1981 he holds degrees from the Pontifical University of Krakow at doctoral level. At present he is the parish priest of Cadci (or Cadca).  I hope we do not have to wait long to hear of an official response from the bishop, Tomas Galis. 


Fr Emil Floris



He warns that the Roma are headed in the same direction

Prague, Sept 6 (ÄŒTK) — Slovak Catholic priest Emil FloriÅ¡ said the Jews themselves are to blame for the Holocaust and the same can happen to Romanies, the Czech daily Právo writes.


"A part of the speech by Floriš, who spoke at a mass in Čadca, north central Slovakia, that was devoted to Jews and the Holocaust offends and humiliates the memory of the victims," Lucia Kollárová, spokeswoman for the Headquarters of the Jewish Religious Communities in Slovakia, told the Slovak news agency SITA, Právo writes.

Kollárová said a part of Floriš's speech included untruths and anti-Semitic cliches, relativizing the suffering of the Jewish population during World War Two, also on the territory of present-day Slovakia.

Floriš reportedly said Jews from all over Europe had been transported to the concentration camps because they were hated, for which they themselves were to blame, Právo writes.

"Now the same is threatening Romanies. Do you know why? Because they abuse the system and charity of people," Floriš said before hundreds of church-goers, Právo writes.

About 70,000 Jews were deported from war-time Slovakia, a Nazi-controlled puppet state, during the war. About 67,000 of them perished in Nazi death camps.

The head of wartime Slovakia, Catholic priest Jozef Tiso was executed as a war criminal in 1947.  


Friday, July 11, 2014

ADSS 10.134 Luigi Maglione to Amleto Cicognani (USA)



Reference: Telegram 1499 (AES 2712/44)

Location and date: Vatican 05.04.1944

Summary statement: The Holy See is doing everything possible for the Jews of Hungary, Romania, Slovakia and the Baltic States.

Language: Italian

Text:

I received your telegram 1840. (1)

As already communicated to Your Excellency, there have been recent renewed appeals made through the Apostolic Nunciature in Hungary, Romania and Slovakia for the Jews resident there. (2)

The Holy See continues to take the utmost interest in the problem. (3)

A similar action will not be possible for the Jews of the Baltic States. (4)

Concerning the Jews in Shanghai, the Japanese government has not responded. (5)

Notes:
(1) ADSS 10.127
(2) See ADSS 10.117.  William Godfrey, Apostolic Delegate in London, had written on 14.01.1944 to Alexander Eastermann (1890-1985), World Jewish Congress: “I feel certain that if His Holiness is in a position to be of any assistance, he will do all he can as constantly as he has done in the past”.
(3) See ADSS 10.137, 158, 187
(4) Nothing was found on this matter. See ADSS 10.313

(5) See ADSS 10.127.

Saturday, April 5, 2014

"The Vatican, the Holocaust and the Archives" Gencocide Perspectives IV (2012)

I have posted an article that I wrote for Genocide Perspectives on the pages section of the blog.  Once again, it points to the enormous resource that ADSS is in our study of the Holocaust.

Saturday, September 29, 2012

ADSS 9.206 Karel Sidor to Maglione on Anti-Jewish measures in Slovakia


The Slovak minister, Karel Sidor had returned from a visit to Bratislava for consultation with his government on a suitable response to the insistent interventions of the Holy See.  Pius wanted the deportation of Slovak Jews - converted or not - stopped.  Giuseppe Burzio, the Vatican's charge d'affaires in Slovakia was energetic in visiting bishops and ministers to press for a permanent halt for any deportation plans.

The diplomatic language reveals two important details:  firstly, Slovakia was not going to accede to the demands of the Holy See, it remained the right of the Slovak government to decide on its Jewish policies; and secondly, in an attempt to stem rising concerns as to the fate of the deported Jews, Slovakia would send a commission to visit Slovak Jews in Poland.  Given what Rome already knew of the fate of Jews sent to Poland, there is little doubt that the promised commission was seen for what it was, a feeble attempt at semantics.  If the Jews were dead, it was not the Slovak government's fault.

ADSS 9.206

Karel Sidor, Slovak Minister to the Holy See to the Secretary of State, Cardinal Maglione
Reference: 68/dôv/1943 (AES 3361/43)

Location and date:  Rome, 28.05.1943

Summary statement: Anti-Jewish measures in Slovakia
Language: Italian

The undersigned Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary of the Republic of Slovakia to the Holy See has the honour to communicate to his Eminence, the Cardinal Secretary of State of His Holiness the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Slovakia in response to the Note of the Secretary of State to His Holiness, number 2.731/43 of 05.05.1943 (1) with his Note of 20.05.1943, number 6.625/1-43 has made known to our Legation the following declaration:

“With reference to the notes, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic is at pains to clarify its point of view as follow:
The statement of the Minister of the Interior, Mach, made in Ružomberok on 07.02.1943 (2) is intended to be understood in the sense of the decree already issued by the Government of the Slovak Republic in regard to the expatriation of the Jews (3), namely:

1. Jews who are a danger to the security of the state will be expatriated from Slovakia.
2. The remaining Jews will be alienated from the economic and cultural life of the nation and will be sent to concentration camps in Slovakia.  The baptised and unbaptised will be sent to separate camps and given the possibility of work.
3.  Jews granted the benefit of exemption by the President of the Slovak Republic are free to exercise their professions and will not be disturbed in their private lives.

Therefore, we authorise you to make our point of view known to the competent agencies of the Secretariat of State of His Holiness with the provision that the Slovak government in agreement with the authorities of the Reich will establish a special Slovak commission comprised of a Catholic priest, a Protestant minister, a State official and a journalist. (4)  This commission will have the competence to visit Slovak Jews residing in Poland, gathering information about them and to ascertain the condition of their living conditions and, in particular to see if baptised Jews from Slovakia are permitted to practice their Christian faith in the concentration camps.  We will communicate the findings of this commission at a later date”. 

Cross references: 
(1)  See ADSS 9.176
(2)  See ADSS 9.85
(3)  See ADSS 8.334
(4)  See ADSS 9.147, where the same guarantees are listed.

ADSS 9.176 Sec State to Slovak Legation on Anti-Jewish actions

In the previous post Cardinal Maglione wrote to the Apostolic Delegate in Turkey, Angelo Roncalli with news that Vatican protests were having some effect in Slovakia.  The following day, the Secretariat made a formal protest to the Slovakian Legation in Rome about ongoing anti-Jewish measures.  In many cases the Vatican's interventions were directed at breaches of Catholic teaching, especially in regard to "mixed" marriages and the status of converts to Catholicism.  Here the Secretariat makes the concerns of the Holy See for all Jews - converted or not - very clear.  It is also worth noting that the Vatican took a much stronger and more direct approach with Slovakia than with any other German-allied government.  I believe this was not because of the priest-president, Tiso, but because Rome sensed a significant part of the government, and more importantly, the bishops, were opposed to the deportations.



ADSS 9.176 
Secretariat of State to the Slovak Legation
Reference: AES 2731/43

Location and date:  Vatican, 05.05.1943
Summary statement: Protest of the Holy See against antisemitic measures of the Slovak government

Language: Italian

The Secretary of State of His Holiness believes it is their duty to submit for the consideration of the Legation of the Republic of Slovakia to the Holy See the following:

With reference to note 8355/41 of 12.11.1941 (1), the Secretary of State brought to the attention of the Slovak Legation the deep regret of the Holy See over the publication by the Slovak Government of an “Ordinance” (2) which established a special “racial” law which contains numerous provisions which are in sharp contrast to Catholic principles, and it expressed confidence that as long as the aforementioned Ordinance had not been withdrawn or appropriately altered, the cited rules would be interpreted and applied in such a way to make as little detrimental impact as possible on Catholic consciences.

The Holy See, then, nurtured hopes that the Slovak government would take into account the feeling of its people, who are almost entirely Catholic, and would not have proceeded to expel by force people belonging to the so-called “Jewish race”.

With great sorrow, the Holy See has learned that transfers of this kind have been made from the territory of the Republic.

This sorrow is increasing because, according to news received from various parts, it would seem that the Slovak government intends to proceed with the transfer of all Jews in Slovakia, not excluding women and children, or those who profess the Catholic religion. 

A confirmation of this could be seen in the speech that the Minister of the Interior made on 7 February 1943 in Ruzenberok, where he said that “having proceeded to eliminate 80% of the Jews, the remaining 20,000 Jews in Slovakia must be transferred”. (3)

This is a grave danger that the Secretary of State feels bound to draw to the attention of the Legation of Slovakia considering the matter shown in the previously mentioned note, in which, among other things, it is pointed out that the Catholic Church welcomes people of any race into her womb, such is her maternal solicitude to arouse and develop feelings of brotherhood and love, among all people, according to the teaching of the Gospel.

Therefore the Holy See would fail in its divine mandate if it did not deplore those provisions and measures that seriously affect the natural rights of men, simply because they belonged to a particular race.

Above all, the Catholic Church cannot remain indifferent to the plight of her children who are removed, often violently, from their homes, and placed in particular pitiable circumstances and sometimes even without necessary religious assistance, thus bring some people’s faith into grave danger.

The pain of the Holy See is more acute, when it considers that such measures are implemented in a nation so deeply Catholic in its traditions, and a government that claims to follow and safeguard these traditions. 

Nevertheless, the Holy See does not want to abandon hope that the Slovak government intends to properly review and appropriately amend the “racial” provisions, removing any inconsistencies with natural and divine law, and, in the meantime, suspending the above mentioned transfers. (4)

Note of Cardinal Maglione: (5)

Nota Bene: Last Saturday – 01.03.1943 – I explained verbally to the Slovak Minister (6) the ideas contained in this draft note, and adding that I had also written on the matter.  The Minister said he would discuss this with his government in the next few days, since he was returning home.  Meanwhile, I wanted to make sure that the measures threatened by the Minister of the Interior would not be translated into action. 03.05.1943.

Cross references: 
(1)  See ADSS 8.199
(2)  See ADSS 8.153
(3)  See ADSS 9.85
(4)  See ADSS 9.206
(5)  These notes were included in a separate file.
(6)  Karol Sidor, Slovak minister to the Holy See.

Tuesday, August 7, 2012

ADSS 9.147 Burzio to Maglione on meeting with Tuka

In a rare display of emotion and language bordering on the intemperate, the Vatican's charge d'affaires, Giuseppe Burzio did not hold back in this report from Bratislava.  The early months of 1943 saw an intensification of fears among the remaining Slovakian Jews that deportations were about to recommence.  

On April 10, 1943, Burzio wrote to Cardinal Maglione summarising about three weeks of activities among the Slovakian bishops (See ADSS 9.85) as well as the news of possible deportations.  It is important to note that a close reading of the documents that have been posted on Slovakia there is a pattern emerging.  Vatican protests were having an effect.  Tiso's government did listen, and it seems that once the bishops gauged the seriousness of Rome's determination to try and stop the trains, they too began to become more vocal in their demands for baptised Jews and respect to be shown for the natural law, which I presume would cover all Jews.  I have no doubt that the Slovak bishops took Rome's interventions as stemming directly from the pope which of course they did. Maglione ensured Pius saw the reports from Bratislava and most certainly passed on papal comments and instructions to Burzio, or at the very least interpreted them according to his understanding of the pope's view of the deportations.  The notes made on several of the reports sent from Slovakia indicate that Pius XII was fully informed and endorsed the Cardinal Secretary of State's instructions to Monsignor Burzio.

Most of the report describes in considerable detail Burzio's uncomfortable meeting with the rabidly antisemitic Minister of Foreign Affairs, Adalbert Tuka.

Burzio described his meeting with Tuka as humiliating, being forced to be in the same room with a man the diplomat described as a "sphinx",  "a maniac" and a "cynical Pharisee".  Burzio's discomfort is evident throughout the report. 

Quoting Tuka at length, Burzio virtually recapitulated the entire catalogue of myths and hatreds ascribed to Jews.  Jews are "pests", "gangsters", "Bolsheviks", "criminals", "asocial", "pernicious","pimps", "destitute", wielders of international influence as well as having influence in Slovakia (despite the deportations), masters of propaganda to make themselves appear to be the victim, and equally masters at duping even the Vatican.  Tuka went on to say that he saw future Slovak historians looking back at him as the one patriot who was prepared to do the deed that needed doing - getting rid of the Jews, all of them.

In a moment of excessive self-promotion Tuka described himself as a believing and practicing Catholic, who received Holy Communion regularly and considered himself a friend of the Church.  And because the rumours of the mistreatment of the Jews, which according to Tuka's logic must originate with them, he promised Burzio to send a commission to see if there was any truth in the rumours.  Nonetheless, the Jews had to go, and the minister promised to see that he fulfilled his duty.

At the end of the report Burzio noted that the priest-president, Jozef Tiso had heard of the interview with Tuka and contacted the charge d'affaires to apologise.  The council of ministers also heard of the papal intervention to halt any resumption of deportations and responded favourably according to Burzio.

This lengthy report has been placed on the pages section of the blog.


Adalbert Tuka (1880-1946)