Showing posts with label Joseph Hurley. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Joseph Hurley. Show all posts

Friday, December 23, 2016

ADSS 1.253 Hurley, Secretariat of State, notes: Myron Taylor and Maglione


ADSS 1.253 Joseph Hurley (1), Secretariat of State, notes

Reference: AES 2287/40

Location and date: Vatican, 08.03.1949

Summary statement: Myron Taylor has met Maglione:  discussed antisemitic movements in the US; nomination of the new Archbishop of Washington; 300 Polish Jews in Trieste who wish to enter Palestine; organising a meeting with Maglione and other ambassadors.

Language: Italian

Text:

Summary of conversation between His Eminence the Cardinal Secretary of State and Ambassador Taylor. (2)

Referring to the conversation I had on 27 February with His Eminence, the Ambassador says that it is better to wait for the return of Mr Welles to Rome before asking the Holy See for a detailed opinion about the present situation in Europe. (3) After he had a meeting with Welles, the Ambassador can ask for the opinion of the Holy See on certain points.

Before the departure of Mr Taylor from Washington, President Roosevelt gave him a memorandum concerning an anti-Jewish movement in the towns of Brooklyn, Baltimore and Detroit.  The President is informed that Catholics in those cities support this movement and he is afraid that, as a result, anti-Catholic feelings may be re-awakened in the nation.  His Eminence calls attention to the great work of the late Pius XI in favour of the Jews; His voice was the only important voice raised in Europe in their favour.  If His Excellency would be good enough to draw up a note on this point it will be examined, by the Apostolic Delegate. (4)

Mr Taylor mentions the activity of Father Coughlan and his violent broadcasts and the misgivings caused by the excitable “radio priest”. (5)  His Eminence says that he is ready to study the question and to examine a note on the matter.

The Ambassador then goes on to say that President Roosevelt has been informed about the possibility of appointing anew Bishop in Washington. (6)  Although the President does not wish to make any recommendations, he mentions that His Excellency, Monsignor Shiel, Assistant at Chicago, would be persona grata in Washington circles. (7) His Eminence says that he does not know anything about this nomination; that the Sacred Consistorial Congregation is competent in this matter and he could eventually send a communication to them.

Then His Excellency says he has received the visit of a group of Polish Jews who are interested in the fate of 300 Polish-Jewish refugees who are at present in Trieste and would like to have the permission of the British Government to enter Palestine.  In reply to His Eminence’s remark that the refugee question has been made even more difficult by the war, the Ambassador replied that in his opinion, the problem only concerns the British Government, but he wanted to inform the Holy See as well. (8)

Finally His Excellency expresses the wish to invite His Eminence to lunch or dinner on the day after Easter.  At the same time he would like to invite all the Ambassadors to the Holy See “to bring them together and make better cooperation with the Holy See possible”.  Later His Excellency would invite all the Ministers to the Holy See.  His Eminence accepts the invitation, preferably to dinner, but with some reservations: that it would take place in a private room, and that Monsignor Hurley, after having been instructed by His Excellency Monsignor Montini, would return to discuss the details with His Excellency Ambassador Taylor.  His Eminence also mentions the austerity imposed by the state of war.  The date has been fixed for Wednesday morning 27 March.


Notes: 
(1) Joseph Hurley (1894-1967), English speaking staff member of the Secretariat of State 1934-40.  Appointed Bishop of St Augustine, Florida 1940.
(2) Myron Taylor (1863-1959), Personal Representative of President Roosevelt to the Holy See with the rank of Ambassador 1940-50.
(3) Benjamin Sumner-Welles (1892-1962), United States Undersecretary of State 1937-43.  See ADSS 1.252n1.
(4) Amleto Cicognani (1883-1973), Apostolic Delegate to the United States 1933-59.
(5) Charles Coughlin (1891-1979), Canadian-American Catholic priest (ordained 1916), was a vitriolic opponent of FDR’s policies.  From the mid-1930s he injected more and more anti-Semitic commentary into his radio broadcasts. He was forced off the air in September 1940 through a combination of church and government pressure and banned by the church from publishing in 1942. From then until his retirement in 1966 he was a parish priest in Michigan.
(6) The Archdiocese of Washington was established on 22.07.1939 united aeque principaliter (literally “of equal importance”) to the See of Baltimore.  The Archbishop of Baltimore, Michael Curley (1879-1947) was now Archbishop of Baltimore and Washington. Washington separated from Baltimore in 1947. See AAS 3.1939, pp668-70.
(7) Bernard Shiel (1888-1969), Auxillary Bishop Chicago 1928-69, was an enthusiastic supporter of FDR’s policies.

(8) See Jewish telegraphic Agency, 21.03.1940.  Britain refused to permit the refugees entry into Palestine on the grounds that since “these Jews had left a territory which was under German control” they could be “technically be considered as ‘enemy aliens’”.

Sunday, May 10, 2015

ADSS 1.35 Notes of Joseph Hurley, Secretariat of State on current tensions


ADSS 1.35 Notes of Fr Joseph Hurley, Secretariat of State (1)

Reference: AES 2778/39

Location and date: 09.05.1939

Summary statement: Conversation with Fr Hurley and A S Rogers, Secretary of the US Embassy to Italy. (2)

Language: Italian

Text:

Mr Rogers, Secretary of the American Embassy at the Quirinal, called this evening on Fr Hurley to ask for information regarding the news published by the New York Times today saying that the Holy See proposed a Five Power Conference (France, Italy, England, Germany, Poland) to settle all the problems that at present trouble the relations between Germany and Poland and between  others of the Great European Powers. (3)

Having guessed the purpose of the visit, Fr Hurley had already asked for instructions.  He was then able to answer that, as was to be expected, the Holy Father follows with great concern the developments of this painful situation in Europe, and has already several times taken the opportunity to maintain peace.  The activity of the Holy See’s Representatives in various capital, which has been noted in the last few days by the newspapers, could be explained I this way, but the news that His Holiness has invited the European Powers to attend a Conference in the Vatican City is not true.

Mr Rogers mentioned that an intervention of the Holy See to call a Peace Conference would meet with general approval in Washington and in the United States and would offer the hope of a happier future to a world worried by the danger of war. As the Holy See is above all questions of material interests which put the nations one against the other, it is perhaps the only Power which could be trusted for its impartiality. Even the nations which are not directly interested in the European disputes, as for example, the United States, are more or less involved in the ideological conflict which divides Europe and are, for that reason, not qualified for the task of peacemakers.  Mr Rogers added that the Italian Government and people would be very pleased if such a conference should take place in the Vatican.

In the following more general conversation, Mr Rogers stated that the Head of the Italian Government told M. Gafencu that the difference between Italy and France are not such as to lead to a war. (3)  Several times the Duce repeated: “We have not yet signed a military pact with Germany”.  The Romanian minister had the clear impression that Mussolini wanted his words to be conveyed to the French Government, which he did not fail to do.

A great difficulty according to Rogers, is created by the present attitude of France towards Italy.  France has taken an intransigent attitude and does not want to move from its position. After the Milan meeting between Ciano and von Ribbentrop, French circles in Rome and newspaper in France, thinking that a final decision had been reached, say that there is nothing else to do.  The British, on the contrary, attribute to this meeting a less tragic meaning by saying that the Milan meeting has hardly changed the situation. (4)

I the end, Mr Rogers begged Fr Hurley to keep the Embassy informed about any eventual initiative of the Holy See, if possible.  Fr Hurley promised to ask for instructions in the matter.



Notes: 
(1) Joseph Hurley (1894-1967) priest of Cleveland Diocese, Ohio.  Worked at the Secretariat of State 1934-40 with the responsibility for drafting all documents of the Secretariat.  Appointed bishop of St Augustine, Florida in 1940.  Some claim he had a major falling-out with Cardinal Maglione over papal policy with regard to the Church’s official response to the fascist powers.
(2) I have been unable to locate any information on A S Rogers.
(3) Grigore Garencu (1892-1957), Romanian Foreign Minister 1939-40.  During a visit to Rome he was received officially by Ciano on 30.04.1939 and Mussolini on 01.05.1939.

(4) Galeazzo Ciano (1904-1944), Italian Foreign Minister met with his German counterpart, Joachim Ribbentrop (1893-1946) in Milan between 6-7.05.1939.  At this meeting Ciano, speaking for Mussolini, gave the German government its agreement to enter into a military pact.  Mussolini was hesitant about supporting Germany’s more aggressive stance and sort to create distance by having Ciano report that Italy would not be ready for war until at least 1942.  Ribbentrop surprised the Italians by saying the same for Germany.