In late June Gary
Krupp emailed me. He emailed me privately because of the restrictions placed on the blog, an necessary evil because of some of the rather inappropriate material that gets sent to me. I have assumed that the email was, therefore, intended for publication. I have delayed responding until I had read the email carefully and ensured that I had answered the points Mr Krupp raised. The email and my responses have been posted under "pages".
Mr Krupp's email was in response
to the posting of my article written on the Campgana Files and a number of posts where I set out my reasons for disputing some of the
claims made by a number of people who assert that Eugenio Pacelli / Pius XII
committed himself to a series of positive actions for Jews before, during and
after the Holocaust. I acknowledge, again, my gratitude to Mr Krupp and Pave The Way for allowing me access to the material. That we disagree on the interpretation of the documents is now a matter of public record.
My primary concern
as a student of history is allowing the record to speak as clearly and
unambiguously as possible. I have never
claimed or suggested that there is only way to look at material, nor have I
ever claimed that there cannot be more than one interpretation of an
event. I have claimed consistently that
context is essential for any serious study of documents and provenance.
To set this
latest email from Mr Krupp into its necessary context a few reminders are
necessary.
The available primary
documentary material on Pope Pius XII consists, in part, of:
a) files and
material in the Secret Archives of the Vatican (ASV) – all files up to 1939 are
available for public inspection, including all material related to Eugenio
Pacelli from the time of his entry into Vatican service in the Congregation for
Extraordinary Ecclesiastical Affairs in 1901, his service as nuncio to Bavaria
and Germany 1917-1929, and his service as Cardinal Secretary of State 1930-1939;
b) published
records of the ASV – including Volume I of Pacelli’s minutes of his audiences
with Pius XI (2010), the selected war year documents in Actes et Documents
(ADSS 1965-1981), the formal record of the Holy See (i.e. Acta) containing many
of the speeches and addresses of Pius XI and Pius XII;
c) The published
war-time records of many of the governments of Europe and the United States ; the published
records of the German bishops;
d) Published and
unpublished sources from numerous diocesan and religious order archives (e.g. Campagna , Italy );
e) Newspaper and
journals from around the world, e.g. The New York Times reported on many papal
speeches throughout the war, including the complete text of the 1942 Christmas
Address.
f) Memoirs,
diaries, monographs, recordings and interviews of many eye-witnesses,
journalists, military personnel, papal collaborators etc.
And for the
record I have never claimed that Pope Pius XII was
i) “silent”
ii) ”inactive and did nothing”
iii) “Hitler’s
Pope”
iv) “Antisemitic”
v) “indifferent to the fate of the Jews”
I have also
expressed my concern at some of the methodologies employed by Pave The Way
especially by some of their researchers.
I am not alone in this.
My comments are
given in RED in the pages section.
No comments:
Post a Comment
You are welcome to post a comment. Please be respectful and address the issues, not the person. Comments are subject to moderation.